Uber’s Policy Change After Its Drivers Threatened to Strike

Uber strikeSept. 12, 2 p.m.:

Uber is famously unafraid of clashing with government regulators. But it might just be terrified of taking on its own drivers.

While Uber has brashly forged ahead with its ride-sharing service in the face of stiff opposition from German authorities (not to mention other protests across Europe), the company on Friday abruptly backed down from recent policy changes that had stirred protests and strikes among as many as 1,000 drivers in New York City. Uber infuriated workers on Labor Day when it said that drivers of its higher-end “Black” and “SUV” services would be sent UberX and UberXL fares as well. “Starting now, all BLACK and SUV partners will automatically receive uberX / uberXL requests,” the company wrote in an email on Sept. 1. Some drivers chose to decline those requests; over the next two weeks, they were told by Uber that declining too many rides could risk deactivating their accounts.

Late on Friday morning, Uber abruptly backtracked. “Effective immediately, UberBLACK and UberSUV partners can choose when and where to receive UberX requests,” the company wrote in an email blast sent to drivers. Further down in the message, it showed an option on the Uber app that allows drivers to switch between accepting UberX rides and limiting requests to only Black and SUV customers. When asked for comment, Uber pointed to that email.

Drivers say Uber’s brief decision to make them accept UberX fares was the latest in a string of shifts that have made working for the company steadily less profitable. Over the summer, Uber slashed fares on UberX by 20 percent to make it “cheaper than a New York City taxi.” At the same time, it has increased the share it takes from drivers. Uber now collects 20 percent of UberX fares (up from 10 percent), 25 percent on Uber Black fares (up from 20 percent), and the same 28 percent on Uber SUV fares.

Uber defends its price cuts and push for drivers to use UberX by arguing that servicing more frequent, albeit cheaper, fares actually leads to increased income for drivers. “[U]berX demand has grown dramatically over the last year, to the point where uberX partners have actually been earning MORE per hour than UberBLACK drivers, after all deductions and expenses,” a company representative wrote in an email to Seddiki. “To address this and help boost BLACK and SUV partner earnings, we allowed partners to opt-in to accepting uberX/XL trips over the summer. The results were dramatic: drivers who accepted X and XL trips earned 35-50% more per hour on average than those who did not. While partners sometimes had slightly higher gas and operating costs from doing more trips, our summer test showed that drivers’ increased earnings more than covered this cost.”

Seddiki contests this math. His own experience shows that it takes, on average, 10 minutes to drive to get an UberX fare and then another five to 10 minutes for that person to come out for the ride. From there, it takes about 10 minutes to complete the usually short rides UberX passengers take. Altogether, that’s 30 minutes for which Seddiki typically gets the $8 minimum. Uber’s 20 percent commission deducts $1.60 and sales tax and black car fees take out another $0.80. Because Uber drivers are contractors and not employees, they also have to cover any expenses they incur while working. For half an hour of driving, Seddiki expects his SUV to consume about $2 worth of gas—much more than the hybrid vehicles used by most UberX drivers will eat up in the same period. “That means before car depreciation and insurance, I end up with $3.60 from $8,” he says. “If we look at it by the hour, that will be $7.20.”

Protests against Uber over wages have already broken out in other parts of the country. On Sept. 2, around 50 Los Angeles–based Uber drivers gathered in a North Hollywood parking lot to rail against recent fare cuts. Earlier this week, 200 drivers assembled outside Uber’s office in Santa Monica to further protest the pay cuts and their treatment by the company. Uber has also been hit with several class actions over its practice of including tips in the commission it collects from drivers. By conceding to drivers on the UberX policy—admittedly a rare step for Uber to take—the company is likely preventing days of bad press and protests that could draw consumers attention to the unrest and accusations of bad labor practices.

Despite Uber’s reversal, organizers said on the Uber Drivers Network NYC Facebook page that the strikes planned for Friday will continue and that a meeting scheduled for 4 p.m. in Queens will still take place. “This is a victory for us,” the network posted on its page. “However our fight MUST continue, because we’ve won a battle but the war is not over.”

Uber is of course interested in keeping rates low to provide its customers with the cheapest fares and most efficient service possible. But riders are only one half of Uber’s platform. And in a market brimming with competition, aggravated drivers have other companies they can choose to work with. Already, Chaudri and Seddiki say they have seen colleagues abandon Uber for its main competitor, Lyft. “In the beginning Uber was very nice with us. Now when you go to the office they treat you like a slave,” says Chaudri, who has also started taking rides for Lyft’s platform. “When Lyft asked me if I had any questions, I said only one: “You will be smiley and nice with us all the time or just for a few months, like Uber”?

allvalleytc.com, valley town car, San Fernando Valley, Car Service, Lax, Burbank airport, Van Nuys, Valley car service, Airport transportation, shuttle, Cheap, affordable, all valley town car service, Santa Clarita Valley, Taxi service,

New Orleans City Council puts Uber battle to rest – for now ( But NO Uber X)

uber news

Council allows hail-a-car apps

 After months of heated debate, the New Orleans City Council finally voted 4-3 to modify the city’s for-hire vehicle ordinance to allow for hail-a-car app technology, including the San Francisco-based transportation app Uber, to operate within the city limits.

  Under the ordinance passed Sept. 4, luxury sedans and limousines will be able to connect with riders using app-based technology on their smartphones. Drivers also will be able to charge customers according to time and miles, much like a cab, but with a minimum fare of $15 for sedans, $25 for luxury SUVs and $45 for all other limousines. The company’s popular “UberX” service, which competes directly with traditional cabs, will not be allowed.

  Those prices, says Uber’s New Orleans General Manager Tom Hayes, will make New Orleans one of the most expensive Uber markets in the country. Hayes told Gambit he’s happy for the win but added the company would like to reduce those minimum fares.

  Members of New Orleans’ taxicab and limousine industry, which fought Uber at every council hearing, reacted with disappointment and anger. They said that they have complied — and must continue to comply — with city standards for cabs while Uber and services like it will receive an unfair advantage in the market.

  District A City Councilwoman Susan Guidry and District E Councilman James Gray have been the most vocal about what they see as the dangers of UberX, citing insurance concerns and the worry that UberX’s drivers have not been properly vetted by the city.

  ”I feel like we’re letting ourselves in for a world of hurt,” Guidry said. “If we had stronger laws, I’d be more comfortable with this.”

  Former Taxicab Bureau Chief Malachi Hull, who was dismissed by the city in July, was similarly disillusioned. “I think the council is misinformed right now,” he said. “What they’ve just done is remove the consumer protections and the safety provisions that were put in the code previously.” Hull also said that wherever Uber is, UberX operates as well, because so few limo companies are willing to work with Uber.

  District D Councilman Jared Brossett, who introduced the ordinance, closed his remarks during the meeting by saying, “It’s about opportunity. It’s competition for everybody, not just some.” He was joined by Council President Stacy Head, Council Vice President Jason Williams and District B Councilwoman LaToya Cantrell in approving Uber Black.

  No timetable was given for Uber Black’s entry into the market, but a search on Uber’s smartphone app at press time showed no cars operating in the city — yet.

Above The Law…. Really ??

Uber and Lyft Withdraw Opposition to State Insurance Bill (Update)

Update, 2:54 p.m.: Uber and Lyft have withdrawn their opposition to AB2293, according to a spokesman from Assemblymember Susan Bonilla’s office.  Uber spokeswoman Eva Behrend released this statement:

“Californians loves Uber and lawmakers have heard them loud and clear. Common sense has prevailed and the winners are Californians.”

Lyft, in turn, released its own statement: “We have agreed to a compromise that provides clarity for the ridesharing community in California. However, a truly permanent solution must include the creation of modern insurance products tailored for drivers who participate in peer-to-peer transportation.”

Original story:

A hotly disputed assembly bill that would make Uber, Lyft, and their drivers pony up for commercial insurance might soon be headed to the governor’s desk, even though both companies have fought tooth and nail to kill it. 

Assembly Bill 2293 — written by Assemblywoman Susan Bonilla (D-Contra Costa and Solano Counties) — was amended late last night to stipulate that all transportation network companies (or TNCs, meaning companies that provide pre-arranged rides via an app) carry hefty insurance policies that don’t leave any coverage gap for their contracted drivers.

The new policies match numbers that Uber and Lyft brass called for in mid-June. They’ll provide at least $50,000 for death and injury per person, $100,000 for death and injury per accident, and $30,000 per incident for property damage. Companies will also have to provide at least $200,000 in excess liability coverage, and $1 million in uninsured motorist coverage that kicks in the moment a passenger enters the vehicle.

Up until now, Uber, Lyft, and their ilk carried $1 million excess liability policies in accordance with rules set last year by the California Public Utilities Commission, but it wasn’t clear whether those policies would actually cover accidents. Uber has largely absolved itself of responsibility for accidents caused by its chartered town car drivers; those caused by civilians who drive for its sedan service, UberX, present a dicier issue.

Under the current rules, TNC drivers are left to fend for themselves — and many of them don’t know that. If an UberX driver gets in an accident, he or she will call his personal insurance carrier, who will in turn decide whether to process or deny the claim. Often, the carrier won’t know that the driver was using his car for commercial purposes, which can’t legally be covered by personal insurance policies. That puts an unfair burden on insurance companies, and an even worse burden on consumers.

Representatives of the insurance industry, whose members supported AB 2293, say that because UberX, Lyft, and other TNC drivers are putting their personal insurance on the line, their risk is getting spread over all California drivers. That means if accidents increase because more people are driving for TNCs, then everyone else’s rates will go up, too. In essence, the public might have to subsidize these obscenely wealthy companies. 

That’s a scary thought, one that Uber doesn’t want voters to be pondering. In campaign e-mail blasts, it presents itself as a scrappy innovator going up against insurance companies, trial lawyers, and the “big taxi cartel.” In reality, it’s an $18.2 billion venture-funded startup with a vast web of lobbyist connections in the capital. 

AB 2293 was sent back to the Senate Rules Committee yesterday; from there it will be re-referred to the Senate floor. It could go up for a vote tomorrow, or more likely Friday.


Uber Wants MY support… To continue to break the LAW. I don’t think so !!

David PUber wants your vote of support. And it has hired a campaign manager to win you over.

Uber, a fast-growing start-up that promotes private car sharing, announced on Tuesday that it had hired the political strategist David Plouffe to be its senior vice president of policy and strategy. The move further signaled the grand aspirations of companies like Uber, which are challenging entrenched industries and running into resistance from some local governments.

Mr. Plouffe, who ran President Obama’s 2008 campaign, said he planned to run Uber’s communication efforts much like a political race, pushing to woo consumers and regulators alike in the company’s fast-paced expansion across the world.

Uber, which allows consumers to summon private rides via a smartphone app, now operates in more than 170 cities globally, the company said. But it has tussled with regulators in the United States and overseas in its race to gain traction in new cities. The legality of the service was questioned in 2012 when it entered New York City. In June, thousands of taxi drivers in Europe tied up traffic as they protested Uber’s rise.

If the government lets them win and do it they’re way, then no one has to follow the rules. It will be Anarchy

Message to Uber.\: Just play by the rules Uber, and we all win… Other wise, “JUST GO AWAY” !

Things are Changing for Uber…

California regulators have ordered ride-sharing services such as Uber to stop operating at airports, at least for now.

The issue is that companies such as UberX, Sidecar, Lyft, and Wingz do not have permits to do airport pick-ups. The companies employ citizen drivers at airports in San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose, Los Angeles and San Diego, the San Francisco Chronicle reports.

“We have heard numerous complaints that (our) safety rules are being ignored,” Michael Peevey, president of the California Public Utilities Commission, wrote on Wednesday in a letter to the companies, according to the Chronicle.

Peevey also said the vehicles lack the proper “trade dress” and proof of insurance, the Chronicle reports.

According to ABC7 in the San Francisco area, authorized taxis also have to pay a $4 fee for their airport fares.

Regulators said if the ride-sharing companies don’t stop operating from the airports within two weeks, their permits will be revoked, completely shutting them down.TAXI-APPS-PROTEST Continue reading